Hello Andy, Thursday, October 9, 2008, 3:28:44 PM, you wrote:
> Hi: >>> The design of the plugin at the moment is a binary decision-- either > the message is spam, or not. << > I understand - but currently the plugin has a config option that performs a "Resultcode >>= Threshold" test. I think it would be more appropriate to have > a "Resultcode in (n, n, n...) " test. It doesn't affect the logic > and doesn't add more complexity Actually, this would add some complexity. The vast majority of folks currently treat all nonzero SNF results the same. ASSP 2.0 is new and the API doesn't yet provide the flexibility to multiplex results from plugins -- Perhaps we missed it or perhaps that will change. At this time we will keep things as they are. Once a few people are using the plugin and we have some feedback then we will be able to consider upgrades. Thanks! _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
