Its odd because the number of messags snf is processing isn't more than
usual and the % of spam being detected through snf is actually lower than
typical yet is is routinely maxing out 4 processors at 100%.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Pete McNeil
<madscient...@armresearch.com>wrote:

> On 2013-03-27 14:38, Darin Cox wrote:
>
>> Probably unrelated... and due to a significant increase in spam over the
>> past few days.
>>
>
> I agree with that -- our inbound spamtrap pre-processor has seen 4x
> increase over the past few days so that's likely to be related.
>
> Also, Richard, I took a quick look at your telemetry and verified that
> your rulebase file(s) are up to date.
>
> Best,
>
>
> _M
>
> --
> Pete McNeil
> Chief Scientist
> ARM Research Labs, LLC
> www.armresearch.com
> 866-770-1044 x7010
> twitter/codedweller
>
>
> ##############################**##############################**#
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>  the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
> This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
> Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
> For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to 
> <sniffer-digest@sortmonster.**com<sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com>
> >
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com**>
> Send administrative queries to  
> <sniffer-request@sortmonster.**com<sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to