As I mentioned before, UUIDs do not solve problem of "last_insert_id()"
when you want to keep your IDs low, in such cases, auto-increment/sequence
are much more reliable.

Artyom


--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Denis Arnaud <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Denis Arnaud <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [SOCI-users] Database independent LAST_INSERT_ID()
> To: "General-purpose list for SOCI users." <[email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 10:18 PM
> If I may, in the newest release of Boost,
> namely the 1.42.0, there is a new component which may be of
> interest for this 
> thread: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_42_0/libs/uuid/index.html
> 
> I
> quote: "The
> header uuid.hpp provides an implementation of Universally
> Unique Identifiers.
> 
> This
> implementation is intended for general use."
> 
> D
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage,
> colocation
> Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best
> network in the business
> Choose flexible plans and management services without
> long-term contracts
> Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a
> phone call away.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Soci-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
> 


      

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Soci-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users

Reply via email to