Hello, Christian. There's a typo there (better saying, a class name from an old version of soci).
Just bellow the example you'll find: With the above type_conversion specialization in place, it is possible to use Person directly with SOCI: SOCI 3.x follow the name convention of boost: small_caps_with_undercores. So, the soci 2.x TypeConversion is now type_conversion and it works ok. It's possible that other doc pages present similar misspellings (i.e., weren't updated to match soci 3.x) Best regards, Francisco 2010/4/20 Christian Auby <[email protected]> > How is SOCI 3.1 doing? Any revisions I should run through our compilers? > > I have an issue using Object-relational mapping, from the example here: > http://soci.sourceforge.net/doc/exchange.html#object_relational > > If I take this exact example code and try to compile it I get the > following errors, on both msvc 9.0 and gcc 4.3.3: > > 11: error: 'TypeConversion' is not a template > 12: error: explicit specialization of non-template 'soci::TypeConversion' > > Has Object-relational mapping changed in git? > > regards, > > Christian > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Soci-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Soci-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
