On 30/09/10 23:36, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > From my point of view, it's more important to have defined > clear, simple and constant scheme of version numbering. > > If there are no alternative proposals, I'd like to stick to this scheme.
A simple alternative: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/Guidelines/MaintenanceGuidelines#VersioningindividualBoostlibraries To all interested package maintainers, share your comments and vote for your favourite option please. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Soci-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
