On 05/01/11 17:00, Julian Taylor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Sylvain Pointeau wrote: > >> in my opinion, other than oracle, the vectors should be filled for >> each row by call backs. >> >> sql << "SELECT A1,A2,A3 FROM TABLE_1", into(a1_vector), >> into(a2_vector) >> >> would it be possible that for each row, we call a function to fill >> a1_vector and another function for a2_vector? >> >> we would not need to cache the results neither to have everything >> as a string. and it would be a shortcut for the hand-coded loop, >> but would not be less efficient. >> >> could we have special case for db other than oracle? > > > I would propose to first do a benchmark to see if this is even > worth it.
+1 IMHO, there is no point in in-depth discussion, unless we have got a least simple measured figures. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Soci-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
