On 10/08/2011 19:51, asif saeed wrote: > Right, I have chosen OTL. Just watching this list to see if you guys can > provide a decent working soci lib.
You are right and I believe that we have achieved the point where some hard but quick decisions need to be taken. So - I propose to make a release that will contain only the parts that are known to work, while leaving the rest in the repository for those who are willing to experiment on their own. Obviously the team is not capable to provide a working solution with CMake and this is the part that introduces a lot of confusion now. The older autotools solution has a very similar status. I propose to exclude both of them from the release and leave only the old-style Makefiles, perhaps together with the Visual Studio project/solution files (if they work). The core of the library, together with Oracle, PostgreSQL and MySQL backends are known to work properly at least on some platforms. There is also a new subtree for bindings to other programming languages with some initial Ada stuff that seems to work, too. These are the things that I propose to include in the official release. Let me know if this is a valid option. I believe that this is the best thing to do now. Best regards, -- Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Soci-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
