On 19 March 2012 09:31, Simon Walter <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 03/17/2012 10:00 PM, Paul Harris wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 16 March 2012 08:42, Simon Walter <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 03/15/2012 03:07 PM, Simon Walter wrote:
> >      > Hi all,
> >      >
> >      > I'm trying read some data from an SQL Server database via ODBC
> >     ala SOCI.
> >      > Everything seems to work except for varchar columns.
> SQLDescribeCol
> >      > generates an error and odbc_soci_error
> >      > "column size" is thrown (soci/src/backends/odbc/statement.cpp -
> >      > odbc_statement_backend::column_size())
> >      >
> >      > I've tried different DBs on the same server, and I still get the
> same
> >      > problem.
> >      >
> >      > The code is as simple as it gets:
> >      >
> >      > std::string resName;
> >      > int res = 5;
> >      > session mssql(odbc, connectString);
> >      > mssql<< "select name from test.dbo.res where id = :res", use(res,
> >      > "res"), into(resName);
> >      >
> >
> >     A follow up to this:
> >
> >     I've tried the using row.get<string>(0) with the same results:
> >
> >     /usr/local/include/soci/row.h:68: T soci::row::get(size_t) const
> [with T
> >     = std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
> std::allocator<char>
> >      >]: Assertion `holders_.size() >= pos + 1' failed.
> >
> >     and a odbc_soci_error with "column size".
> >
> >     I've tried the same queries with libodbc++ and get back results
> >     correctly.
> >
> >     I don't see how something as common as that would be a bug, but
> perhaps
> >     no one is using odbc. I'm using unixODBC 2.2.14.
> >
> >     How can I verify this is (not) a bug with unixODBC?
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >
> >     Simon
> >
> >
> > Does this look related?
> >
> > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-16946
> >
> > I have stumbled onto unixodbc bugs before, the one I hit still exists in
> > the current Debian unixodbc, although its fixed in the latest unixodbc
> > source release.
> >
> > Are you running a 64-bit machine?
> > Does the bug occur on a 32-bit machine?
> >
>
> Thanks Paul,
>
> It looks like it could be related. However, I am using a 32-bit OS
> (debian 6) VM hosted on a 64bit machine. So I don't think any 64bit
> issues are a problem here. Though, it does look like it could be a
> unixODBC issue. Is there any way I could verify it is indeed unixODBC
> before I go through with building everything?
>
> Simon
>
>
Well then it probably won't be a 32-64 bit issue (I used schroot to allow
me to install and run 32 bit debian inside my 64 bit debian).  Unless you
are connecting to a 64 bit server.

I think I verified my bug by compiling unixodbc in debug-mode, so then I
could step through the unixodbc code that was called from my app (as its a
library that you link to).

And/or, build and use the latest unixodbc, see if the bug occurs.  It will
require automake/configure/make to /usr/local since debian doesn't have the
latest unixodbc.

cheers
Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Soci-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users

Reply via email to