Hi

We added NDEBUG=1 later, but I expected that this should be done
automatically - maybe we need to explicitly add NDEBUG=1 if cmake is
invoked in Release/RelWithDebugInfo configurations?

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Mateusz Loskot <[email protected]> wrote:
> (This is another post I've forgotten to answer completely.)
>
> On 9 March 2012 15:34, Alex Ott <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thank you Mateuz
>>
>> Regarding build - we've used cmake -DBUILD_TYPE=Release, but assert
>> was left in binary...
>
> As the comment says, the assertion is not a strong check,
> but for testing purposes:
>
> assert(sz < std::numeric_limits<unsigned short>::max()); // Not a
> strong constraint, for debugging only
>
> If it is annoying while testing your software with debug build of SOCI,
> then I see no problem with commenting it.
>
> If you get it caught in release build with NDEBUG=1, then it means
> the build is misconfigured, isn't it?
>
> For debug build, I'd keep the assert as it may be useful,
> but if it makes trouble in release mode, then the build should
> be fixed. Not sure what's happening there though.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
> _______________________________________________
> soci-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users



-- 
With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
http://alexott.net/
Twitter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
Skype: alex.ott

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________
soci-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users

Reply via email to