Whoever comes across this old thread, here is the new discussion on the subject where we're trying to clarify the integer support:
https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30443672 Mat On 4 September 2010 08:47, Chris Breneman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working with an application that uses a BIGINT (UNSIGNED) column > type in a MySQL database, and uses the full (64 bit) range of the field. > >From reading the SOCI documentation, it seems that BIGINT fields are > truncated to 32 bit ints. Is there planned support for using 64-bit > ints for the BIGINT field? If not, what would be involved (and where > would I start looking) in creating support for this? > > Also, this same application uses some normal INT UNSIGNED fields, but > expects the full range of the 32 bit UNSIGNED type. Does SOCI correctly > handle signed vs unsigned types? If not, what would be involved in > making it correctly handle these? > > Thanks, > Chris Breneman > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > Soci-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users > -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ soci-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
