On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:54:54 +0100 Denis Arnaud <[email protected]> wrote:
DA> Hi Vadim, DA> DA> Boost.Test, in combination with CMake, works pretty well. Hello Denis, I have no doubt that Boost.Test works well, I used it in several projects (CMake -- not so much, but it's a different story) and until recently it was my preferred C++ unit testing framework. But then I discovered CATCH and was really impressed by it, although, again, I didn't use it enough to be sure that it scales well, and I also think it's a nice match for SOCI as it doesn't need to be built and is also more lightweight/even less restrictive than Boost.Test and so it should be easier to transition to it. Also, it is still actively developed and improved, unlike Boost.Test which hasn't changed for years. So I think it could be interesting to try using CATCH. After all, why not? DA> You can browse through a full example with the following project: DA> http://github.com/airsim/stdair/. By default, (Boost.Test-based) test DA> checking is activated; it may be de-activated thanks to the DA> '-DENABLE_TEST:BOOL=OFF' option passed to the CMake command-line. Thanks, this should definitely be useful if we go this way. But personally I'd still be curious to try using CATCH. Regards, VZ
pgpYVfEyxhXvx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________ soci-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
