Did you mean there should or could be an ultimate ORM interface to promote as a 
standard into C++?
Though I doubt this is feasible, I agree with you, that a higher level of 
interaction with DB may be preferred.
What ORM solutions for C++ are you familiar with?
If you feel this question is a bit off topic, you can answer me direclty.

02.04.2013, 15:54, "Bruce Adams" <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>     One key thing missing from N3612 is object relational mapping. It is not 
> appropriate in all cases but it does make working
> with databases so much more convenient. Low level access should be possible 
> (though sometimes I question this) but not required.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bruce.
>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> From: Sergei Nikulov <[email protected]>
>> To: SOCI general discussion list <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:34 PM
>> Subject: Re: [soci-users] The next three big things
>>
>> 2013/3/28 Mateusz Loskot <[email protected]>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There has been interesting discussions about integer support
>>> and new tests lately and I'll follow up in relevant threads in details soon.
>>> There is also lots of ideas and brainstorming about future plans:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/SOCI/soci/wiki/Roadmap
>>>
>>> There are three big things that will either require substantial
>>> amount of work or will introduce major changes:
>>>
>>> 1. Buried headers - major structural change
>>> Perhaps it is good chance to
>>> - rename headers .h to .hpp,
>>> - introduce backend specific namespaces (see Roadmap)
>>> - clean up the repo tree a bit, evict www to separate repository
>>> - ???
>>>
>>> 2. New tests
>>>
>>> 3. C++ integer types support
>>>
>>> Do we all agree to release those features in SOCI 4?
>>>
>>> Initially, having SVN experiences in mind, I thought it's
>>> important to do the buried headers and all structural
>>> changes first.
>>> Is my concern justified, shall we do the revolution first?
>>>
>>> OTOH, it's Git, so we branching is effortless (tm).
>>> We can branch off of develop and start working on
>>> each of them in parallel.
>>> Does anyone see any problem with that?
>>>
>>> The branches will be most likely long-running
>>> branches, so I'd like to publish them in SOCI/soci repo,
>>> i.e.
>>> feature/buried-headers
>>> feature/new-tests
>>> feature/cpp-integer
>>> Then, everyone will be able to contribute with pull requests
>>> against those branches, review, the code, etc.
>>>
>>> Any comments on how we should proceed?
>>>
>>> p.s. It looks, development discussions wiggle between soci-users
>>> and soci-devel. I personally have no problem with use either or both.
>>> But, if there are subscribers on soci-users list who do not wish to receive
>>> posts related to development process, speak up please.
>>> Then I'll ask to move such talks to soci-devel completely.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> --
>>> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
>>
>> Here the database interface proposal http://isocpp.org/files/papers/n3612.pdf
>>
>> I think we can pick something from this paper.
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Sergei Nikulov
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Own the Future-Intel&reg; Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
>> Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
>> Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
>> on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
>> Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
>> _______________________________________________
>> soci-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
>
> ,
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
> Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete
> for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam.
> $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo
> by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2
>
> ,
> _______________________________________________
> soci-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users

-- 
Best regards,
Viacheslav Naydenov.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
_______________________________________________
soci-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users

Reply via email to