On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde <m...@pengutronix.de>wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 06:12 PM, Jargalan Nermunkh wrote: > >> You mean without the patches mentioned above, I mean the unpachted > >> 2.6.35.x, your can controller was missing frames? After applying these > >> patches that problem was fixed? > > > That is correct. The patch added proper handling of RX1 when there is a > > rollover from RX0 to RX1. > > Hmmm, does it? But it's good as it improves your situation. > > >> Can you ensure with a 3rd system, preferred with a different CAN core, > >> that the frames send to the bus are correct? > > > I connected a board to a lawicel CAN dongle and receiving on the board > > (sending from dongle) is fine but sending (with cangen) from the board to > > the dongle produces repeated frames. > > We're talking about sending on the mc251x? This is even a different > problem. > Yes this is a different problem. > >> Which driver is active in your setup? Does this happen with both > >> versions of the driver? > >> > > > > I am currently using the inline driver. > > What do you mean? Are you using net-next-2.6/master with my series > applied or 2.6.35.x? > I am a bit new to this sorry about the confusion. I am using 2.6.36-rc4 found here: http://arago-project.org/git/people/?p=sneha/linux-davinci-staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/davinci-spi-rewrite cheers, > Marc > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | > Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | > Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | > > -- Jargalan Nermunkh
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-users mailing list Socketcan-users@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users
