I mean output to an ICE par, not to a CP par, which is akin to hitting your testicles with a large mallet.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:07 AM, joshxsi <josh...@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI, outputting to a parameter to ICE is around 10x slower than outputting > to a transform, so I highly recommend that if performance is a requirement, > never output from ICE into a parameter. > > Cheers, > -j > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Raffaele Fragapane < > raffsxsil...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> You might be better off decoupling the length computation, which tends to >> be expensive with any high order surface or curve, and output it to a >> parameter you fetch from graphs further down the stream. >> That way you should save a fair chunk of cycles. >> >> If you need to keep them aligned you could also use some tricks to >> basically reduce the dirtyness to a simpler check, like comparing point >> positions before you start integrating your length function. >> > > -- Our users will know fear and cower before our software! Ship it! Ship it and let them flee like the dogs they are!
