Thanks for the info, Paul and Peter - much obliged :) Morten
Den 15. april 2013 kl. 20:54 skrev pete...@skynet.be: > If you just want to polygonize pointclouds and be done with it – get > Polygonizer I guess. > > But If you’re at all excited by the prospect of messing around with > topology in ICE – rather go for Topolizer. > (to me, it felt faster and with better control for Polygonizing as well - > though that’s just a hunch) > > > > Paul Griswold <mailto:pgrisw...@fusiondigitalproductions.com> > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:51 PM > To: Morten Bartholdy <mailto:x...@colorshopvfx.dk> ; > softimage@listproc.autodesk.com <mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com> > Subject: Re: emTopolizer or emPolygonizer? > > Polygonizer is easier/faster to set up & has more features for doing > meshing. Topololizer's meshing tools are really there to supplement and > support all the features of Topolizer. To mesh anything with Topolizer you > have to go through a bit of setting up first. > > I have both of them & if I need to mesh something quickly I always would > choose Polygonizer. If I need to do more than just mesh, then Topolizer > comes into play. > > It's really a matter of what you need to do. But really they're not > terribly expensive, so if you can swing it I'd recommend getting both. > > -Paul > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Morten Bartholdy < x...@colorshopvfx.dk > <mailto:x...@colorshopvfx.dk> > wrote: > > A question to Mootzoiding colleagues: > > > > I am considering getting emPolygonizer4 or emTopolizer for current > > polygonizing needs. I have checked Eric's video demos and read up on > > features but I am still not quite sure which one is the better choice for > > my needs. > > > > It looks like emTopolizer is newer and more optimized especially with > > regards to efficiency when polygonizing, plus it adds some very interesting > > features emPolygonizer does not have. From the feature list, the only thing > > I have found so far where emPolygonizer might have a feature emTopolizer is > > missing, would be liquid filaments. > > > > Could any of you who might have tested both share some insight on pros and > > cons? I am really short of time so I just don't have time to check the > > respective demos, so I am hoping someone knows this :) > > > > Eric is busy - otherwise I would have asked him ;) > > > > Thanks > > > > Morten > > > > > > > > >
