I cannot see the value add of the /@<corename? over /<corename> And '@' is not a friendly URL character --Noble
On Dec 11, 2007 8:05 PM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henrib wrote: > > > > To be honest, I am not a big fan of the '/@corename' syntax ; I feel the > > '?core=corename' syntax carries less surprise and may be extended more > > easily (Stu's comment in solr-350). > > I've uploaded a small patch to solr-350 (solr-350.patch) so the core as a > > request parameter works again (& passes the core as a request attribute > > after it has been resolved). > > > > There are two problems with ?core=xxx > > 1. For some requests (multipart?), calling req.getReqeustParameter( > "core" ) mucks up the whole request > > 2. Philosophically, there is something off about having different paths > available based on a request parameter. Consider core0 with a handler > registered at /path but core1 does not: > > http://host/path?core=core0 [200 OK] > http://host/path?core=core1 [404 Not Found] > > > ryan > -- --Noble Paul
