[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12688102#action_12688102
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1079:
---------------------------------------------
bq. almost no one will have pre-conceived notions about what "omitTf" will do
anyway... they will need to look at the description. Hence this is really only
a documentation problem, not a naming problem.
Good point! It if confuses me, I'm sure to check the documentation before
changing it.
I'm open to keeping it as is or changing it to conform to Lucene. I don't think
it matters too much.
My main goal is to make everybody aware of Lucene's changes and to have more
documentation on this. Neither the example schema nor the SchemaXml wiki page
have any details about omitTf. The only place it is mentioned is the change log.
> Rename omitTf to omitTermFreqAndPositions
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1079
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1079
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentation, update
> Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> LUCENE-1561 has renamed omitTf.
> See
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/376c1c12dd464164/lucene_1561_and_omittf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
