[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1095:
----------------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-1095.patch
Here's a patch to fix this issue.
It:
# Adds tests
# Simplifies the inform code (fixing another issue related to the original code)
# Fixes the performance problem
# Fixes a small performance problem on the KeepFilter
> StopFilterFactory should not use HashSet
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1095
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: SOLR-1095.patch
>
>
> Rev 680935 of StopFilterFactory introduced some changes that can cause poor
> performance do to the use of HashSet instead of CharArraySet in the inform()
> method. I noticed this while profiling
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/f46f0edfc439356c/solr_user_upgrade_from_1_2_to_1_3_gives_3x_slowdown
> whereby 20% of the time spent in indexing occurred in Collections.addAll()
> in the Lucene StopFilter due to the execution of the else clause in the lines:
> {code}
> if (stopWords instanceof CharArraySet) {
> this.stopWords = (CharArraySet)stopWords;
> } else {
> this.stopWords = new CharArraySet(stopWords.size(), ignoreCase);
> this.stopWords.addAll(stopWords);
> }
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
