I 'solved' this by removing some of the 'AND' from my full query. AND
should be optional but have no effect if there, right ? But for me it
was forcing the score to 0.
Which might be the same as saying nothing matched ?
Tom
On 13/01/17 15:10, Tom Chiverton wrote:
I have a few hundred documents with title and content fields.
I want a match in title to trump matches in content. If I search for
"connected vehicle" then a news article that has that in the content
shouldn't be ranked higher than the page with that in the title is
essentially what I want.
I have tried dismax with qf=title^2 as well as several other variants
with the standard query parser (like q="title:"foo"^2 OR
content:"foo") but documents without the search term in the title
still come out before those with the term in the title when ordered by
score.
Is there something I am missing ?
From the docs, something like q=title:"connected vehicle"^2 OR
content:"connected vehicle" should have worked ? Even using ^100
didn't help.
I tried with the dismax parser using
|"q": "Connected Vehicle", "defType": "dismax", "indent": "true", "qf":
"title^2000 content", "pf": "pf=title^4000 content^2", "sort": "score
desc", "wt": "json", but that was not better. if I remove content from
pf/qf then documents seem to rank correctly. |
Example query and results (content omitted) :
http://pastebin.com/5EhrRJP8 with managed-schema
http://pastebin.com/mdraWQWE
--
*Tom Chiverton*
Lead Developer
e: t...@extravision.com
p: 0161 817 2922
t: @extravision <http://www.twitter.com/extravision>
w: www.extravision.com
Extravision - email worth seeing <http://www.extravision.com/>
Registered in the UK at: 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
Manchester, M15 4LD.
Company Reg No: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed
and may contain confidential or privileged information.
Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
