i'sorry, i am not familiar with the maillist operation.
my question is:

i check the solr source code, and find it uses lucene's QueryParser to parse
user's input querystring

for example, a query like this "name:ibmT63notebook" ,solr will parse it
like 'name:"ibm T63 notebook"' , it regard this as a PhrazeQuery,so it

will use PhrazeQuery.

but i want to get a result which include "ibm" and "T63" and "notebook" at
any postion. for example ,it should match  some sentence like "i have a
notebook ,it is t63 of ibm"..

but solr doesn't do that,it consider that queryparser as  a PhrazeQuery, how
can i do that as my mind?



2008/8/18, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Actually we have commit and optimize as separate request parameters
> defaulting to true for both full-import and delta-import. You can add a
> request parameter optimize=false for delta-import if you want to commit but
> not to optimize the index.
>
> I've updated the wiki. Thanks for pointing it out.
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I see in the DIH wiki page :
> > [...]
> > full-import [..]
> > commit: (default 'true'). Tells whether to commit+optimize after the
> > operation
> > [...]
> >
> > but nothing for delta-import... I think it would be useful , a 'commit'
> > (default=true) , 'optimize' (default=false) for the delta-import - these
> > should most probably be separate ones, i think.
> >
> > - for full-import , wouldn't it make sense to split commit + optimize
> into
> > 2 different options? Granted, if I do a clean=true,  i'd probably want
> > (need!) an optimize... even then, optimize may be too slow / use too much
> > memory at that point in time... ? ( not too sure about this argument..)
> >
> > cheers,
> > B
> > _________________________
> > {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
> >
> > Never take Life too seriously, no one gets out alive anyway.
> >
> > I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when
> > wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You
> have
> > been Warned.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>

Reply via email to