On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:23:48 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:08:24 -0300
> "Alexander Ramos Jardim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you wanna a full web service for SOLR example? How a .wsdl will help you?
> > Why don't you use the HTTP interface SOLR provides?
> >
> > Anyways, if you need to develop a web service (SOAP compliant) to access
> > SOLR, just remember to use an embedded core on your webservice.
>
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:37:24 -0400
> Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > WSDL? surely you jest.
> >
> > Erik
>
> :D I obviously said something terribly stupid, oh well, not the first time
> and most likely wont be the last one either.
>
> Anyway, the reason for my asking is :
> - I've put together a SOLR search service with a few cores. Nothing fancy,
> it works great as is.
> - the .NET developer I am working with on this asked for a .wsdl (or
> .asmx) file to import into Visual Studio ... yes, he can access the service
> directly, but he seems to prefer a more 'well defined' interface (haven't
> really decided whether it is worth the effort, but that is another question
> altogether)
>
> The way I see it, SOLR is a RESTful service. I am not looking into wrapping
> the whole thing behind SOAP ( I actually much prefer REST than SOAP, but that
> is entering into quasi-religious grounds...) - which should be able to be
> defined with a .wsdl ( v 1.1 should suffice as only GET + POST are supported
> in SOLR anyway).
>
> Am I missing anything here ?
>
> thanks in advance for your time + thoughts ,
> B
To be clear, i don't suggest we should have a .wsdl for example, simply asking
if there would be any use in having one.
but given the responses I got, I'm curious now to understand what I have gotten
wrong :)
Best,
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
I sense much NT in you.
NT leads to Bluescreen.
Bluescreen leads to downtime.
Downtime leads to suffering.
NT is the path to the darkside.
Powerful Unix is.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
