Hi Amar,

What version of Solr are you using?  This looks like a bug that was fixed in 
Solr 6.6.1: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7878>.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Nov 2, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Amar Raja <amar.r...@thecommercepartnership.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have the following field definition:
> 
> <fieldType name="text_en" class="solr.TextField" positionIncrementGap="100">
>  <analyzer type="query">
>    <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>    <filter class="solr.SynonymGraphFilterFactory" synonyms="synonyms.txt"
> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>    <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true"
> words="lang/stopwords_en.txt" />
>    <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>    <filter class="solr.EnglishPossessiveFilterFactory"/>
>    <filter class="solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory"
> protected="protwords.txt"/>
>    <filter class="solr.PorterStemFilterFactory"/>
>  </analyzer>
> </fieldType>
> 
> And the following two synonym definitions:
> 
> kids => boys,girls
> metallic => rose gold,metallic
> 
> The intent being a user searching for "kids" should get girls or boys
> results, but searching for "boys" will not bring back girls results.
> Similarly searching for "metallic" should bring back results for either
> "metallic" or "rose gold", but the search for "rose gold" should not bring
> back "metallic".
> 
> Another property I have set is q.op=AND. I.e. "boys tops" should return
> where only both terms exist.
> 
> The first synonym works well, producing the following dismax query:
> 
> (+(+DisjunctionMaxQuery((Synonym(web_name:boi
> web_name:girl))~1.0)))/no_coord
> 
> However, for the second I get this:
> 
> (+(+DisjunctionMaxQuery(((((+web_name:rose +web_name:gold)
> web_name:metal)~2))~1.0)))/no_coord
> 
> But for any terms where any of the terms in the RHS have multiple terms, it
> seems to want to match both synonyms, so in this case only documents with
> both "metallic" and "rose gold" will match.
> 
> Any ideas where I am going wrong?

Reply via email to