Hmm. Fields used for faceting will also be used for filtering, which is a kind
of search. Are docValues OK for filtering? I expect they might be slow the
first time, then cached.

wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)

> On Oct 19, 2020, at 11:15 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> uyilmaz:
> 
> Hmm, that _is_ confusing. And inaccurate.
> 
> In this context, it should read something like
> 
> The Text field should have indexed="true" docValues=“false" if used for 
> searching 
> but not faceting and the String field should have indexed="false" 
> docValues=“true"
> if used for faceting but not searching.
> 
> I’ll fix this, thanks for pointing this out.
> 
> Erick
> 
>> On Oct 19, 2020, at 1:42 PM, uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net.INVALID> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks! This also contributed to my confusion:
>> 
>> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/faceting.html#field-value-faceting-parameters
>> 
>> "If you want Solr to perform both analysis (for searching) and faceting on 
>> the full literal strings, use the copyField directive in your Schema to 
>> create two versions of the field: one Text and one String. Make sure both 
>> are indexed="true"."
>> 
>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:08:00 -0400
>> Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I think this is all explained quite well in the Ref Guide:
>>> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/docvalues.html
>>> 
>>> DocValues is a different way to index/store values. Faceting is a
>>> primary use case where docValues are better than what 'indexed=true'
>>> gives you.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>>  Alex.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 12:51, uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hey all,
>>>> 
>>>> From my little experiments, I see that (if I didn't make a stupid mistake) 
>>>> we can facet on fields marked as both indexed and stored being false:
>>>> 
>>>> <field name="nonStorednonIndexedDocvalues" type="string" indexed="false" 
>>>> stored="false" docValues="true"/>
>>>> 
>>>> I'm suprised by this, I thought I would need to index it. Can you confirm 
>>>> this?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net>
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net>
> 

Reply via email to