Hi There

 

I have recently upgraded a solr database from 7.7.1 to 8.7.0 and not wiped
the database and re-indexed (as this would take too long to run on site).

 

On my local windows machine I have a single solr server 7.7.1 installation

 

I upgraded in the following manner

 

*       Installed windows solr 8.7.0 on my machine in a different folder
*       Copied the core related folder (holding conf, data, lib,
core.properties) from 7.7.1 to the new 8.7.0 folder
*       Brought up the solr
*       Checked that queries work through the Solr Admin Tool and our
application

 

This all worked fine until I tried to update a record which had been created
under 7.7.1. Instead of marking the old record as deleted it effectively
created a new copy of the record with the change in and left the old image
as still visible. When I updated the record again it then correctly updated
the new 8.7.0 version without leaving the old image behind. If I created a
new record and then updated it the solr record would be updated correctly.
The issue only seemed to affect the old 7.7.1 created records.

 

An example of the duplication as follows (the first record is 7.7.1 created
version and the second record is the 8.7.0 version after carrying out an
update):

 

{

  "responseHeader":{

    "status":0,

    "QTime":4,

    "params":{

      "q":"id:9901020319M01-N26",

      "_":"1610016003669"}},

  "response":{"numFound":2,"start":0,"numFoundExact":true,"docs":[

      {

        "id":"9901020319M01-N26",

        "groupId":"9901020319M01",

        "urn":"N26",

        "specification":"nominal",

        "owningGroupId":"9901020319M01",

        "description":"N26, Yates, Mike, Alan, Richard, MALE",

        "group_t":"9901020319M01",

        "nominalUrn_t":"N26",

        "dateTimeCreated_dtr":"2020-12-30T12:00:53Z",

        "dateTimeCreated_dt":"2020-12-30T12:00:53Z",

        "title_t":"Captain",

        "surname_t":"Yates",

        "qualifier_t":"Voyager",

        "forename1_t":"Mike",

        "forename2_t":"Alan",

        "forename3_t":"Richard",

        "sex_t":"MALE",

        "orderedType_t":"Nominal",

        "_version_":1687507566832123904},

      {

        "id":"9901020319M01-N26",

        "groupId":"9901020319M01",

        "urn":"N26",

        "specification":"nominal",

        "owningGroupId":"9901020319M01",

        "description":"N26, Yates, Mike, Alan, Richard, MALE",

        "group_t":"9901020319M01",

        "nominalUrn_t":"N26",

        "dateTimeCreated_dtr":"2020-12-30T12:00:53Z",

        "dateTimeCreated_dt":"2020-12-30T12:00:53Z",

        "title_t":"Captain",

        "surname_t":"Yates",

        "qualifier_t":"Voyager enterprise defiant yorktown xx yy",

        "forename1_t":"Mike",

        "forename2_t":"Alan",

        "forename3_t":"Richard",

        "sex_t":"MALE",

        "orderedType_t":"Nominal",

        "_version_":1688224966566215680}]

  }}

 

I checked the solrconfig.xml file and it does have a uniqueKey set up

 

              <field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true"
required="true" multiValued="false" />

                  

<uniqueKey>id</uniqueKey>

 

I was wondering if this behaviour is expected and if there is a way to make
sure that records created under a previous version are updated correctly (so
that the old data is deleted when updated).

 

Also am I upgrading solr correctly as it could be that the way I have
upgraded it might be causing this issue (I tried hunting through the solr
documentation online but struggled to find window upgrade notes and the
above steps I worked out by trial and error).

 

Many thanks

 

Matthew

 

Matthew Flowerday | Consultant | ULEAF

Unisys | 01908 774830|  <mailto:matthew.flower...@unisys.com>
matthew.flower...@unisys.com 

Address Enigma | Wavendon Business Park | Wavendon | Milton Keynes | MK17
8LX

 

 <http://www.unisys.com/> 

 

THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this
in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
attachments from all devices.

 <http://www.linkedin.com/company/unisys>    <http://twitter.com/unisyscorp>
<http://www.youtube.com/theunisyschannel>
<http://www.facebook.com/unisyscorp>  <https://vimeo.com/unisys>
<http://blogs.unisys.com/> 

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to