it is not a good idea to optimize the index everytime you commit. That is why your downloads are taking so long
2009/4/2 Johanna Mortemousque <johanna...@gmail.com>: > I've so many update, almost 2 000 every 20mn, that lucene merge my index > folder, > so everytime my slave replicate its a new index folder merged so every time > it brings back 10G datas. > > And during this time my repond time of my request are very slow. > What can I check? > > Thanks Paul > > 2009/4/2 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@gmail.com> >> >> slave would not show increased request times because of replication. >> If it does should be some bug >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:00 PM, <johanna...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I think its the same problem, tune jvm for multi thread ... 20request >> > seconde. >> > no?? >> > >> > >> > >> > Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:47 PM, sunnyfr <johanna...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I think about the slave. >> >>> When I start in multi thread 20 request second my cpu is very bad. >> >>> I'm sure I don't manage properly my gc. I've 8G per slave it should be >> >>> fine. >> >>> >> >>> I wonder, I shouldn't put 7G to xmx jvm, I don't know, >> >>> but slave is as well a little problem during replication from the >> >>> master. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> If you are looking at the QTime on the master it is likely to be >> >>>> skewed by ReplicationHandler becaus ethe files are downloaded using a >> >>>> request. On a slave it should not be a problem. >> >>>> >> >>>> I guess we must not add the qtimes of ReplicationHandler >> >>>> --Noble >> >>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:34 PM, sunnyfr <johanna...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hi, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Just applied replication by requestHandler. >> >>>>> And since this the Qtime went mad and can reach long time <int >> >>>>> name="QTime">9068</int> >> >>>>> Without this replication Qtime can be around 1sec. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I've 14Mdocs stores for 11G. so not a lot of data stores. >> >>>>> I've servers with 8G and tomcat use 7G. >> >>>>> I'm updating every 30mn which is about 50 000docs. >> >>>>> Have a look as well at my cpu which are aswell quite full ? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Have you an idea? Do I miss a patch ? >> >>>>> Thanks a lot, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Solr Specification Version: 1.3.0.2009.01.22.13.51.22 >> >>>>> Solr Implementation Version: 1.4-dev exported - root - 2009-01-22 >> >>>>> 13:51:22 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22846336/CPU.jpg CPU.jpg >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> View this message in context: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/JVM-best-tune--help-...-solr1.4-tp22846336p22846336.html >> >>>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> --Noble Paul >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> View this message in context: >> >>> >> >>> http://www.nabble.com/JVM-best-tune--help-...-solr1.4-tp22846336p22846546.html >> >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> --Noble Paul >> >> >> >> >> > Quoted from: >> > >> > http://www.nabble.com/JVM-best-tune--help-...-solr1.4-tp22846336p22846716.html >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> --Noble Paul > > -- --Noble Paul
