So what I decipher from the numbers is w/o queries Solr replication is not performing too badly. The queries are inherently slow and you wish to optimize the query performance itself. am I correct?
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:50 PM, sunnyfr <johanna...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > So I did two test on two servers; > > First server : with just replication every 20mn like you can notice: > http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu_without_request.png > cpu_without_request.png > http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu2_without_request.jpg > cpu2_without_request.jpg > > Second server : with one first replication and a second one during query > test: between 15:32pm and 15h41 > during replication (checked on .../admin/replication/index.jsp) my respond > time query at the end was around 5000msec > after the replication I guess during commitment I couldn't get answer of my > query for a long time, I refreshed my page few minutes after. > http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu_with_request.png > cpu_with_request.png > http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu2_with_request.jpg > cpu2_with_request.jpg > > Now without replication I kept going query on the second server, and I can't > get better than > 1000msec repond time and 11request/second. > http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu_.jpg cpu_.jpg > > This is my request : > select?fl=id&fq=status_published:1+AND+status_moderated:0+AND+status_personal:0+AND+status_private:0+AND+status_deleted:0+AND+status_error:0+AND+status_ready_web:1&json.nl=map&wt=json&start=0&version=1.2&bq=status_official:1^1.5+OR+status_creative:1^1+OR+language:en^0.5&bf=recip(rord(created),1,10,10)^3+pow(stat_views,0.1)^15+pow(stat_comments,0.1)^15&rows=100&qt=dismax&qf=title_en^0.8+title^0.2+description_en^0.3+description^0.2+tags^1+owner_login^0.5 > > Do you have advice ? > > Thanks Noble > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/solr-1.4-memory-jvm-tp22913742p22930179.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- --Noble Paul
