The javabin format does not have many dependencies. it may have 3-4 classes an that is it.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Mauricio Scheffer <mauricioschef...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nope. It has to be manually ported. Not so much because of the language > itself but because of differences in the libraries. > > > 2009/11/13 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com> > >> Is there any tool to directly port java to .Net? then we can etxract >> out the client part of the javabin code and convert it. >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Has anyone looked into using the javabin response format from .NET >> (instead >> > of SolrJ)? >> > >> > It's mainly a curiosity. >> > >> > How much better could performance/bandwidth/throughput be? How difficult >> > would it be to implement some .NET code (C#, I'd guess being the best >> > choice) to handle this response format? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Erik >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> ----------------------------------------------------- >> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com >> > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
