On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:12:20PM -0500, Jeff Ortel wrote: > >> 8.1.11 (the one in RHEL 5) and later. > > Yes, this was confirmed by Satellite Roadmap alignment. > > It has been mentioned that there are advantages to using 8.2. Are there
The target is 8.1, not 8.2. PostgreSQL in RHEL 5 won't be rebased. And we do not want to ship our own version of PostgreSQL. > Even easier, since the plan is to have a separate schema directory tree > containing manually maintained .sql files for managing the pg schema, we > can just strip syntax not applicable to pg in these files. I still hope that we can reach a situation when source SQL files that do not need to be different will not be duplicated in the repository. Having two trees and remembering to do every change in both sounds like a mantinenance nightmare to me. >> +1. Especially the monitoring schema makes heavy use of synonyms. >> Getting the schema cleaned up will be a big win. > > I didn't think we still used synonyms (even in the monitoring schema), > do we? We do. -- Jan Pazdziora | adelton at #satellite*, #brno Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
