On 08/21/2013 01:57 PM, Tomas Lestach wrote: > Does this mean the reproducer is wrong? Shall I take two packages of same > name, arch and evr? xulrunner-devel-17.0.5-1.el6_4-x86_64 and > xulrunner-devel-17.0.5-1.el6_4-x86_64 (let's say signed with another gpg key)?
Exactly - the problem arises when both a new package in an updated errata and a package already present in a less recent, cloned errata have identical (name, evr, arch). I apologize for my first explanation and examples not being clear enough. > Actually it should not be possible to change the content of RHEL channels, > so if you found a way how, please, let me know. In our case, the vendor simply changed a patch, adding packages. Custom channels/patches could also run in the same issue. Thanks, regards, -- Silvio Moioli SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg Germany _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
