On 26 April 2019 at 13:46 BST, Michael Mraka wrote:
> Laurence Rochfort: >> Hi all, >> >> I was looking at the COPR project for Spacewalk 2.9 and noticed that >> some of the spacewalk-* packages have a 2.8.x version, whereas in the >> SPACEWALK-2.9 git tag they have a 2.9.x version. >> >> The main spacewalk package stands out in particular. >> >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/spacewalkproject/spacewalk-2.9/ >> >> I noticed the following packages have different version numbers from >> git: >> >> spacewalk-proxy-installer 2.8.6-1.fc28 14 days ago succeeded >> Disabled - >> spacewalk-config 2.8.5-1.fc28 14 days ago succeeded >> Disabled - >> spacewalk-setup-postgresql 2.8.4-1.fc28 14 days ago succeeded >> Disabled - >> spacewalk-proxy-selinux 2.8.3-1.fc28 14 days ago succeeded >> Disabled - >> perl-Satcon 2.8.2-1.fc28 14 days ago succeeded Disabled >> - >> spacewalk 2.8.2-1.fc28 14 days ago succeeded Disabled >> - >> spacewalk-proxy-docs 2.8.2-1.fc28 14 days ago succeeded >> Disabled - >> spacewalk-proxy-html 2.8.2-1.fc28 14 days ago succeeded >> Disabled - >> >> Could somebody please confirm if the correct versions have been built on >> COPR? > > Hello Laurence, > > these versions are ok. There has been no change during Spacewalk 2.9 > development in these packages. If you look into .spec you can see > Version: 2.9.0 here but it is just a result of an automatic version > bump so the first real change in the package would increased version to > 2.9.1. > > Let's check latest tagged versions: > $ cd spacewalk.git > $ git checksout SPACEWALK-2.9 > $ for t in spacewalk-proxy-installer spacewalk-config > spacewalk-setup-postgresql spacewalk-proxy-selinux perl-Satcon spacewalk-2 > spacewalk-proxy-docs spacewalk-proxy-html ; do git tag | grep $t | tail -1 ; > done > spacewalk-proxy-installer-2.8.6-1 > spacewalk-config-2.8.5-1 > spacewalk-setup-postgresql-2.8.4-1 > spacewalk-proxy-selinux-2.8.3-1 > perl-Satcon-2.8.2-1 > spacewalk-2.8.2-1 > spacewalk-proxy-docs-2.8.2-1 > spacewalk-proxy-html-2.8.2-1 Thanks for the explanation, Michael. I do wonder if having the main Spacewalk 2.9 package have a version of 2.8 is a little confusing for a sys admin who's not so familiar with Spacewalk? If I were to ask yum which version of Spacewalk I have installed and it says 2.8, or the main package version didn't match all the others, then it might be confusing and cause me to try to upgrade? Just a thought. -- Cheers, Laurence. _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
