yes, but i use their level 1 protection. level 2 & 3 are indeed aggressive. but i am also of the opinion that isps are partly responsible for their clients using their bandwidth to spam and they should blacklist these customers and take legal action against them.
Shantanu -- * Joe Canner <jcan...@gwa.ac.ma> [090227 19:43]: > I'm not a big fan of UCEProtect right now, as their list blocks our outgoing > mail because our ISP is associated with large amounts of spam. This > methodology, while no doubt effective at blocking spam, must generate a lot > of false positives because of this "guilt by association" philosophy. Our > ISP is one of the 3 or 4 largest ISPs in Morocco, so I am not confident that > they will do anything that will convince UCEProtect to un-blacklist them. > > -----Original Message----- > From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org > [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Kulkarni Shantanu > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 12:23 > To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > Subject: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis > > Hi, > i am happily using spamdyke on few of my mail servers. i have put a small > page on > comparison of some easy spam blocking ways. please do check it out at, > http://www.shantanukulkarni.org/spam_analysis.html > > Shantanu > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
