On 11/02/2011 03:11 AM, t...@uncon.org wrote: > Quoting Eric Shubert<e...@shubes.net>: > >> I've been wondering though about perhaps using tmpfs for the graylist >> tree. That might be a potential solution as well for hosts that process >> huge amounts of email. Of course the whole tree would be lost on >> rebooting, but if that was a problem it could be copied off periodically >> and restored. If I get some time one day, I may do some test comparisons. >> > > The thought of using up RAM for the graylist data doesn't fit well > with me. I'd much rather have the RAM used as file cache, for both the > mail itself, and for things like AV signatures. > > -trog
Me too, but it depends on the amount. We're only talking inodes really. Might not take up all that much space. You're running a huge amount of messages though, so it might be a significant amount. Just a thought. -- -Eric 'shubes' _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
