I've considered doing this for a while now, if I can find a good balance between helpful diagnostics and exposing too much information to the recipient. My first impulse is to just find a way to output the spamdyke "ALLOWED" log message into the message headers, since it contains pretty much everything of interest. What do you think? Would showing (for example) the authenticated username to the recipient be a problem?
-- Sam Clippinger On Mar 28, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Eric Shubert <e...@shubes.net> wrote: > With spamdyke handling TLS and authentication, this visibility in the > message headers disappears. What's the status of having spamdyke insert > a header into the message indicating such things (and whatever else > might be pertinent)? Or is that already in 5.0? > > Thanks. > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
_______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
