On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:55:22 -0700
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As explained in the comment: this reduces the padding.
> The previous way needed one word per bitfield; this way
> they all fit into the same word...
>
Ah, didn't realize that. I blame the effect two weeks of vacation has on the
brain. :)
Perhaps shuffling them all to the end (before private) so that it is more clear
that they are grouped because of padding issues?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here, but then my first cup of coffee is
> still trying to do its work. Are you saying you want me to
>
> - increase the padding again?
> - define an MMC_RSP_SPI_BUSY, and use that?
>
> The former would bother me a bit, but I could understand if you wanted
> it to be in a different patch. The latter is no problem at all.
>
Well, both initially. But padding is a relevant concern, so I'm content with
the latter.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
spi-devel-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
