>> Okay; I unimaginatively decided that would be Hard. Wouldn't that break >> the ABI, and therefore be rejected unilaterally? I'm willing to try to >> craft a patch and submit it; but maybe I just need encouragement <grin>. > > I started looking at this, talked to Dave Airlie and he suggested to ask > on xorg-devel either Adam Jackson or Keith Packard about one of two > suggested solutions I fielded, expand BlockHandler with a pReadmask or > add a third callback (in addition to BlockHandler, WakeupHandler) > BlockWriteHandler. The later won't break the internal Xorg / module ABI, > but is a little ugly IMO. The former breaks it.
I've started a conversation on the xorg-devel mailing list[1], and I'll follow up directly in irc with Adam and/or Keith if I don't get any answers. Could I ask that my last patch be committed regardless? You really cannot use Xspice if the large ping results in an EAGAIN result; the client just hangs. Cheers, Jeremy [1] http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-June/031728.html _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
