On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 03:08:35PM -0500, James Turner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:41:12AM -0800, Colin Percival wrote: > > Hi spiped users, > > > > I've just uploaded a tarball which may be (modulo version number update) > > spiped 1.6.2. Please test this -- even if all you have time to do is check > > that it compiles on your platform, that's better than nothing, but running > > 'make all test' and/or testing with live usage would be much better. > > > > You can download the spiped code at > > https://www.tarsnap.com/spiped/spiped-1.6.1.99.1.tgz > > and the tarball has SHA256 hash > > 8a95c78a52ad1edad56536c812a9acbcdfe88c69a722b287887fc0bcb46b7f74 > > . You can also see the tree from which I rolled this almost-release at > > https://github.com/Tarsnap/spiped if you find it useful to crawl through > > VCS history. > > > > Changes since 1.6.1.99 (the first "potential 1.6.2"): > > * Fix to the arm32 build. > > * Tests are now cleaned as part of 'make clean'. > > * ENOPROTOOPT is ignored from SO_REUSEADDR (as far as we know, only Hurd > > does this, but it's allowed by POSIX). > > > > Assuming nobody finds any more problems, I'll deliver spiped 1.6.2 as > > a Christmas present. If other issues show up, it might be a New Years' > > present. As always, Tarsnap bug bounties apply to issues found in spiped. > > > > -- > > Colin Percival > > Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve > > Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid > > Looks good here on OpenBSD -current. Tho I do see the following warnings > with clang.
So sorry these are warnings you added! Doh