On 11/4/06, Rick Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, Jet? There's a blast from the past. I would be amazed if you could get > 100% of the unit tests to pass, as some of Jet's SQL syntax can vary quite a > bit from ANSI standards. > > Did you use an ODBC connector, DAO or ADO? A general-purpose ODBC connector > for SA would be a really nice addition. > that will be very nice (the ODBC) think
> Rick > > > > > On 11/2/06, hjr < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've started on a Jet database engine for sqlalchemy. > > > > I've only just started so at the moment it passes 60% of the unit > > tests. > > > > I am doing this because I am limited to a locked down windows machine > > with only the Jet engine at my disposal! > > > > Anyway, if I can get the unit test a bit higher would there be any > > chance / interest in including this in the SVN code? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Hugh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
