Upgrading a specific dialect (EXASOL) to 1.1.9 made me stumble across this test (part of test_reflection.py):
https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/blob/rel_1_1_9/lib/sqlalchemy/testing/suite/test_reflection.py#L737 def test_get_table_names(self): tablenames = [ t for t in inspect(testing.db).get_table_names() if t.lower() in ("t1", "t2")] eq_(tablenames[0].upper(), tablenames[0].lower()) eq_(tablenames[1].upper(), tablenames[1].lower()) The test case fails and this does not look too unexpected to me. The tables T1 and T2 are added to the tablenames array, and u"t1".upper() is always different from u"t1".lower(). Am I missing the purpose of the test case or is this always bound to fail? -- SQLAlchemy - The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper http://www.sqlalchemy.org/ To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example. See http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
