> >I do not consider this a bug. INSERT OR REPLACE is not an UPDATE so > >an UPDATE trigger should not fire on an INSERT OR REPLACE. So don't > >be looking for me to change it anytime soon. > > > > I was thinking more along the lines of a DELETE. That would be an accurate > semantic, would it not?
Yes, what about firing the DELETE trigger? During REPLACE a row is deleted, isn't it? Regards, Alex
