On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 2:23 PM Wout Mertens <wout.mert...@gmail.com> wrote:
> AFAIK, your best bet is to put a file db on a ramdisk (tmpfs). That's not a very portable solution, and a work-around at best. I don't see anything technical that would prevent WAL to work for ":memory:". "Shared-memory" "in-process" is just memory about all... And mutexes already exists in SQLite to protected access when necessary. In-memory DBs are just so useful, and WAL is just so useful, I just don't see why we can't have both at the same time. Richard? > The ":memory:" DB is per connection only. > Not really. You can open the same :memory: DB from different connections in the same process, via URIs. --DD _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
