On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 at 01:24, Clemens Ladisch <clem...@ladisch.de> wrote:
> Max Vlasov wrote: > > bcc 5.5 compiler ... didn't like long long constants > >such as -2251799813685248LL > > If you want to make this particular compiler happy, use > -2251799813685248i64. > Thanks, this helped when I tested this scenario. Interesting that while searching and replacing I found a comment existing in 3.6.10 version (the earliest I have) and probably prior that addressed the problems with exposing 64-bit constants to compilers > /* Some compilers complain about constants of the form 0x7fffffffffffffff. > ** Others complain about 0x7ffffffffffffffffi64. The following macro seems > ** to provide the constant while making all compilers happy. > */ > # define MAX_ROWID (i64)( (((u64)0x7fffffff)<<32) | (u64)0xffffffff ) So probably it's hard to keep making all compilers (old and young) happy all the time :). Thanks to Richard and the team for at least trying to make them as happy as it's possible. Max _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
