At the moment it's difficult to tell but I envisage 3-4gb being the maximum.
Cheers, Mike On 18 October 2012 13:17, Joe Mistachkin <sql...@mistachkin.com> wrote: > > Mike King wrote: >> >> Thanks - sorry to be a pain but is this on the roadmap for the future? >> (For the thing I'm playing with this is the difference between storing >> images in the database or storing them in the filesystem). >> > > Out of curiosity, what size images are you dealing with? Unless they > are really large, any efficiency gains from using incremental BLOB I/O > would probably be minimal. > > Anyhow, I've created a ticket to track this feature request, here: > > http://system.data.sqlite.org/index.html/info/32d482b38b > > Now, it's on the roadmap; however, I'm not sure about the timeline of > getting this implemented. > > -- > Joe Mistachkin > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
