Yes.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:18 PM, L. Wood <lwoo...@live.com> wrote: > > I expect #2 to work best. Make sure to enclose the whole thing in an > > explicit transaction (or at least, run large batches within explicit > > transactions; one implicit transaction per deleted row will be slow as > > molasses). > > If I do this, would you expect _step() for the "BEGIN TRANSACTION" query > and _step() for each "DELETE" query to be very fast, but the _step() for > the "END TRANSACTION" query to take most (99%) of the time? > > Would you expect a similar speed boost for "INSERT"? Is one by one > "INSERT" in a similar way slow as molasses, and wrapping many inserts in a > transaction recommended? > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
