On 8/22/15, Scott Robison <scott at casaderobison.com> wrote: > I don't object to a change to accommodate C99 null > pointer requirements
Please note that the warning in question has nothing to do with NULL pointers. The pointer parameter (0) is non-null. The issue is that the last parameter (2) which is a size_t might sometimes be zero and the compiler felt compelled to share that bit of knowledge, thinking that we might have meant to put the zero in the penultimate parameter (1) which is of type int. -- D. Richard Hipp drh at sqlite.org
