Okay, I blocked the sqlite-users at sqlite.org address in the to address so if it is sent alone, it will be blocked.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Mike Owens <mikeowens at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh okay. I see. I'll look into it. > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Darren Duncan <darren at darrenduncan.net> > wrote: >> >> So in that case, still have the SQLite mail server reject messages to the >> old list rather than forwarding them, and let the problematic MUAs deal with >> it. The key thing is that by not forwarding but rejecting, the mail server >> isn't sending out 2 copies of messages directly, and the rejecting is >> reminding people to pay attention until the issue as a consequence goes >> away. Thus any explicit Reply-To headers can be left unmunged by the list >> server. -- Darren Duncan >> >> >> On 2015-03-02 7:10 PM, Mike Owens wrote: >>> >>> The problem is that this is the very bone of contention in the reply-to >>> religious war. Is it not? I may be wrong, but I thought this is the very >>> setting that people get so defensive about changing. As we have it now, >>> people have a suitable default pointing back to the (correct) list but >>> also >>> the freedom to change the reply-to header should they want to. If we >>> strip >>> the reply-to header in order to correct for the problematic MUA's, then >>> the >>> latter freedom is lost. And if I remember correctly, some people get very >>> angry about this. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Darren Duncan <darren at darrenduncan.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-03-02 6:14 PM, Mike Owens wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:27 PM, R.Smith <rsmith at rsweb.co.za> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ah, thank you, all makes sense now. If you change the first option to >>>>>> YES >>>>>> then nobody else's quirky reply-to headers will get into the list, and >>>>>> the >>>>>> second option remains as is (it should be setting the standard >>>>>> @mailinglists reply-to field) - this should solve the duplication >>>>>> issue, >>>>>> but if it is disagreeable to anyone, more consideration is needed. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I almost don't want to even speak of this for fear that this issue will >>>>> raise it's ugly head again. Per the Mailmain documentation ( >>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html): >>>>> >>>>> Beware! Reply-To: munging is considered a religious issue and the >>>>> policies >>>>> >>>>>> you set here can ignite some of the most heated off-topic flame wars >>>>>> on >>>>>> your mailing lists. We'll try to stay as agnostic as possible, but our >>>>>> biases may still peak through. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> That's as much as I'll say about that. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Well it doesn't have to be complete munging, rather just enough munging >>>> to >>>> remove references to the old mailing list name. -- Darren Duncan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sqlite-users mailing list >> sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org >> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > > > -- > Mike -- Mike
