On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Richard Hipp <drh at sqlite.org> wrote:
> On 10/7/15, Jaroslaw Staniek <staniek at kde.org> wrote: > > ? would you elaborate what? is the > > benefit of using x.y.z versioning scheme if so many new features come to > > the "z" release? > > [...] The community seems to want the second number (current 8) to > increment > every time a new feature is added to SQLite. I will take your request > under advisement. Realize, however, that had the current preferred > number scheme been used for SQLite from the beginning, the next > release would be called 3.112. > That 3.112 version is a better reflection of all the changes in a way. Minor version bumps are kinda arbitrary, why 3.8.12 and not 3.9.0 indeed. Table-valued functions are a big enough change to warrant it IMHO, but maybe that's just me. --DD
