It should definitely be read-only. There would be no meaning in trying 
to write a count of something.

- Sean

Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 10:10:29AM -0500, Rick Flosi wrote:
>> I think it might not exist b/c it isn't very SQLObjecty.
>> You'd be returning an object with a new field in it, SUM(), which isn't 
>> part of the SQLObject and probably a subset of the SQLObject fields as 
>> well. This isn't very OO which is what I think SQLObject was designed for.
> 
>    Sean have promised to try to produce a patch, but I am sure it would be
> very hard to create a proper sqlobjectish design for this excessive column.
> Should the designer add it to sqlmeta.columns? should it be a read-only
> property?
> 
> Oleg.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss

Reply via email to