On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:58:44PM +0200, Markus Gritsch wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What do you think of this one?
> >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1653898&group_id=74338&atid=540674
>
> I applied it and looked at the changes it makes. The last hunk
> is exactly the one I proposed
That's why I asked you about it.
> Next, the patch contains some code to eliminate the possibility that
> the connection parameters 'charset' and 'sqlobject_encoding' can be
> different
I will unapply that part.
> And last, the patch adds a new UnicodeStringLikeConverter which
> encodes to 'utf8' hardcoded. I doubt that this is the correct thing
> to do under all circumstances.
That's probably good for connections that support neither unicode nor
dbEncoding. At least there is a chance an unicode expression could be
passed to the DB.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
