I've been using squid3 with epoll support for a couple of months. In my case, squid with poll/select did consume up to 100% CPU. With epoll, CPU usage dropped to less than 10%.
Long term average & max CPU usage: http://webs.uolsinectis.com.ar/garana/x/cpu.4.png With epoll, CPU usage over the last 24 hours: http://webs.uolsinectis.com.ar/garana/x/cpu.png Regards, Gonzalo On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:47:30 +0100 (CET) Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Muthukumar wrote: > > > Is there anyone benchmarked squid+epoll() on polygraph? How may I expect requests > > satisfaction limit on Linux host > > 2.6.5-1.358 #1 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux platform? > > There has not been any benchmark on Squid-3 + epoll in a long time. The > performance of this is not known. > > The Squid developers is currently focused on first getting Squid-3 > reasonably stable and correct before looking at performance. > > > During polygraph testing, I am getting errors as, > > 004.03| ./Xaction.cc:79: error: 1/1 (267) unsupported HTTP status code > > 004.03| ./Xaction.cc:79: error: 2/2 (267) unsupported HTTP status code > > Could be many things. > > I would recommend starting with a Squid-2.5 to verify that you have the > Polygraph setup correct. This should run without any errors except the > expected ones.. > > Then try out Squid-3. > > Regards > Henrik >
