Hi Henrik,
At 03.32 13/09/2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Serassio Guido wrote:
Just for my check, bugs #1327, #1351 and #1370 can be marked "PATCH25" ?
You are looking into stealing my bugs? You are most welcome to ;-)
This week only I have a lot of free time to spend on Squid, so I'm
looking for anything that I'm able to do ... :-)
#1351 and #1370 is ready to commit as-is. (and hence the report is
already set to P1). For the LDAP helpers just remember to grab the
official patch as the bugzilla patch only addresses one of the two..
(exact same problem in squid_ldap_group).
Ok, I will compare 2.5 and 3.0 source code to check any missing thing.
1327 needs to be ported, but it is maybe best to do this after the
cleaned up NTLM framework is in place and is why I did not move it
to the porting queue just yet.. Kinkie?
But on the other hand, thinking about what #1327 changes there is
little or no conflict with the NTLM rewrite so it should be OK to
move this forward immediately if you prefer.
I take a look, if the forward port is simple, i will do it.
Henrik, you are the "SSL guru". If you have time, do you can look to
bugs #859, #1269 and #1355 ? The SSL code in 3.0 is heavy refactored,
and for me is very hard to understand what should be changed (if any).
Regards
Guido
-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
